Chi 2010 program committee

In making a subcommittee choice you should make careful consideration of what the most central and salient contribution of your work is, even if there are several different contributions. Perhaps this is a very new topic. It covers a lot of ground. It's not an exact fit for any of the subcommittees, but several choices are plausible.

To choose between them, you need to make a reasoned decision about the core contributions of your work. Should it be evaluated in terms of the usage context for the target user community? The novel methodology developed for your study? The system and interaction techniques you have developed? Each of these evaluation criteria may partially apply, but try to consider which is most central and which you most want to highlight for your readers.

Also look at the subcommittees, the people who will serve on them, and the kind of work they have been associated with in the past. Even if there are several subcommittees that could offer fair and expert assessments of this work, go with the one that really fits the most important and novel contributions of your paper. That committee will be in the best position to offer constructive and expert review feedback on the contributions of your research.

Subcommittees are listed and described below. Each has a title, short description, and an indication of who will Chair and serve on the subcommittee. Subcommittees have been constructed with an eye to maintaining logically coherent clusters of topics — these are largely as set up for CHI with some changes, in part as a result of the need to balance the expected number of papers for each subcommittee and in part based on experiences in This subcommittee will focus on papers which make a contribution by extending the design and understanding of applications for specific domains of interest to the HCI community, or by bringing enhancements to particular user communities of interest.

Examples of application areas include but are not limited to: elearning, home, office, elderly, children, ecommerce, sustainability, creativity. Contact: interaction-groups. Papers and Notes archival format, 10 pages maximum for papers, 4 pages maximum for Notes. The CHI Papers and Notes program committee will consist of subcommittees that each focus on a subset of topics in human-computer interaction.

As an author, you decide which subcommittee reviews your paper. Authors also must specify the review subcommittee, contribution type, and keywords. At the Conference: Present a talk of 25 minutes Papers or 15 minutes Notes , including questions. The following overviews the submission and review process: The CHI program committee consists of subcommittees that each focus on a subset of topics in human-computer interaction.

The author decides which subcommittee reviews his or her paper. The CHI program committee is divided into topical subcommittees to help handle the over 1, Papers and Notes submissions while improving the quality of reviews. When you submit a paper, you will designate which subcommittee you want to handle your submission.

You will see a list of subcommittees and descriptions of the topics they cover, the name of each Subcommittee Chair, and the names of some of the Associate Chairs serving on each subcommittee. Using all of this information, it is your responsibility to select the subcommittee that offers the best expertise to assess your research, and that you believe will most fully appreciate your contribution to the field of HCI.

If you are still unsure, you can email the subcommittee chair for advice. As an author, this empowers you to choose the appropriate audience to review your research. Selecting a subcommittee The author selects a contribution type that guides how the paper should be evaluated by reviewers and by the program committee.

You will also designate the contribution type that best fits your paper, selected from a list of contribution types. By officially recognizing different contribution types, CHI encourages a variety of submissions, and guides referees to review your Paper or Note using criteria appropriate to the type of contribution.

Each contribution type will have its own review criteria, but the primary criteria for significance of all Papers and Notes remains the research's contribution to HCI. The CHI program committee strongly encourages reviewers to review your paper according to its contribution type. Selecting a contribution type Papers and Notes are handled by the same program committee.